|
Dear Subscriber The "Before The Election Prediction" I write and publish this essay on Saturday, November 1, 2008, just a few days before the US Presidential Election where, as I say here, it makes no difference WHO wins, McKain or Obama.
WHY? Because, finally I can do what few if any talk show hosts or authors are brave enough to do: Tell The Truth About WHY. Pundits have been insistent, for decades, that "the voter is always right." That is now proven false. In this case, no matter which candidate gets elected, we have enough evidence that a majority of voters, either now, or in some soon-election, will vote for free hand-outs and welfare. The Dark Times Digest will bring you the evidence of the social decline on the planet, and the impending doom that befalls us UNLESS? That, too, will be espoused here.
I've added a small excerpt from a more recent WSJ article below Dr. Laffer's excerpt. This administration and Congress will be remembered like Herbert Hoover.Wall Street Journal:SourceBy ARTHUR B. LAFFERAbout a year ago Stephen Moore, Peter Tanous and I set about writing a book about our vision for the future entitled "The End of Prosperity." Little did we know then how appropriate its release would be earlier this month. Financial panics, if left alone, rarely cause much damage to the real economy, output, employment or production. Asset values fall sharply and wipe out those who borrowed and lent too much, thereby redistributing wealth from the foolish to the prudent. This process is the topic of Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book "Fooled by Randomness." When markets are free, asset values are supposed to go up and down, and competition opens up opportunities for profits and losses. Profits and stock appreciation are not rights, but rewards for insight mixed with a willingness to take risk. People who buy homes and the banks who give them mortgages are no different, in principle, than investors in the stock market, commodity speculators or shop owners. Good decisions should be rewarded and bad decisions should be punished. The market does just that with its profits and losses. No one likes to see people lose their homes when housing prices fall and they can't afford to pay their mortgages; nor does any one of us enjoy watching banks go belly-up for making subprime loans without enough equity. But the taxpayers had nothing to do with either side of the mortgage transaction. If the house's value had appreciated, believe you me the overleveraged homeowner and the overly aggressive bank would never have shared their gain with taxpayers. Housing price declines and their consequences are signals to the market to stop building so many houses, pure and simple. But here's the rub. Now enter the government and the prospects of a kinder and gentler economy. To alleviate the obvious hardships to both homeowners and banks, the government commits to buy mortgages and inject capital into banks, which on the face of it seems like a very nice thing to do. But unfortunately in this world there is no tooth fairy. And the government doesn't create anything; it just redistributes. Whenever the government bails someone out of trouble, they always put someone into trouble, plus of course a toll for the troll. Every $100 billion in bailout requires at least $130 billion in taxes, where the $30 billion extra is the cost of getting government involved. If you don't believe me, just watch how Congress and Barney Frank run the banks. If you thought they did a bad job running the post office, Amtrak, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the military, just wait till you see what they'll do with Wall Street. Some 14 months ago, the projected deficit for the 2008 fiscal year was about 0.6% of GDP. With the $170 billion stimulus package last March, the add-ons to housing and agriculture bills, and the slowdown in tax receipts, the deficit for 2008 actually came in at 3.2% of GDP, with the 2009 deficit projected at 3.8% of GDP. And this is just the beginning. The net national debt in 2001 was at a 20-year low of about 35% of GDP, and today it stands at 50% of GDP. But this 50% number makes no allowance for anything resulting from the over $5.2 trillion guarantee of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac assets, or the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). Nor does the 50% number include any of the asset swaps done by the Federal Reserve when they bailed out Bear Stearns, AIG and others. But the government isn't finished. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid -- and yes, even Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke -- are preparing for a new $300 billion stimulus package in the next Congress. Each of these actions separately increases the tax burden on the economy and does nothing to encourage economic growth. Giving more money to people when they fail and taking more money away from people when they work doesn't increase work. And the stock market knows it. ____________________ Here is the additional excerpt from the WSJ of October 31, 2008:
The remainder of these articles is at: CLICK HERE Click here or on the image at the top (the target) to visit my web page -- much more is available and soon will be published. Karl Loren And, if you have not already signed up for the Dark Times Digest letter, and wish to do so, please insert you name and eMail below. If you are already signed up? And you subscribe "again?" You'll get a message that you are already subscribed -- so no problem with trying it. We never rent, share or sell names or addresses -- all are for the use of Karl Loren only.
|