 Dark Times Digest #21
She Viper
The female viper is a particularly vicious stealth killer. The FDA Viper uses drugs for slow death and shock treatment to alter the mind of the enemy.
 The FDA and the CIA have long been the hidden support for the continued drugging and psychiatric torture in the US. They've taken their lessons from the Chinese and Russians, use these torture techniques liberally, but, unlike the Chinese and Russians, they US is far more effective in hiding this use from the public -- until now.
You may dismiss the worry about Big Brother controlling your very life, movement and emotions with implanted medical devices?
But, the past perimeter of safety has been, the skin of your body.
You figure that no one can get inside that perimeter without your knowledge and  permission? What if the new universal health plan, needing to find "more efficient medical practices," announces a new way to greatly reduce YOUR risk of death with a simple implanted medical device that provides exactly the right type of cardiac electrical impulse to recover you from a heart attack?
Perhaps if you've not had a heart attack, you won't opt for this implant, but the first time you fall on the floor, near death, heart attack, and you are recovered from death by the defibrillator in the emergency ambulance -- then? -- some doctor may convince you that you could have died had the ambulance not arrived in time.
The doctor may (gently or not) offer a painless in-the-office procedure that inserts a  small micro-chip into your chest -- this chip will send a wireless message to your doctor's computer if your heart stops and the doctor, at the push of a button, can give you your defibrillator treatment wherever you might be -- you get the treatment and escape death again -- this time, perhaps, you will be more careful about taking your heart pills (which another implanted medical device can send a message to a different doctor when you fail to take the required drug).
You will see this she-viper FDA Commissioner, daughter of stolen riches, friend of mental "health treatment" push these devices to get approved in every possible place -- and eventually many of them will be reversible to CAUSE the harm which they, at first, are claimed to prevent. Click here for One article, HERE for another, and HERE for the broad background of this new FDA commission, Margaret Higgens.
In our own "ancient" history -- back to the few short year to the founding of this great nation, there was NOTHING in our US Constitution nor in our Declaration of Independence nor in any of the early government law that "gave" health care to anyone.
Health care was always an individual and personal responsibility.
You would care for your spouse and children, most probably, with the same intentions as for yourself, and if you were "hard up," you might beg, or someone might, without force, decide to perform an act of charity and give you something you needed -- whether it was food, some doctor who "gave" his care to you without pay, or some other form of non-governmental help.
Ever since then, man in the US, and in most of the "civilized world" choose to NOT take responsibility for himself and family -- and the trend then started, hundreds of years ago, to allow "others" to pay for your personal lack of responsibility, and finally to invent "charity hospitals" and "insurance" to allow these other entities to take over for your personal failure to care for yourself.
That march toward "universal abandonment" of personal responsibility is almost total and complete for this sick society.
The latest abomination of the "Obama Health Care Plan" STARTS with the now - accepted premise that "people" have a "right" to health care -- the argument then moves over from "having" that as a right to "what type of health care" and "who will pay for it?"
Even conservative Republicans are in favor of "health care reform," but few if any are bold enough to suggest that we need, rather, to move back toward a system of "total personal responsibility" for health care as well as retirement, and even "local protection" from local criminals when the elected sheriff fails to do the duty he was given by our Constitution and Laws.
Man has come down the trail to accepted absence of personal responsibility to the point where it is actually ILLEGAL to attempt to take personal responsibility, for instance, in areas like personal health care.
My own wife, Jean Ross, lay dying from Stage III+ esophagus cancer, having taken all the traditional medical treatments including chemo therapy and radiation demanded of her by Arzoo and others.
SHE made the personal decision to TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for her own health and life, and announced to her Oncologist and Radiologist, as well as other assorted hospital and other medical professionals, that SHE HAD CHOSEN, AS HER RIGHT OF PERSONAL CHOICE, TO DISCONTINUE ANY FURTHER RADIATIONOR CHEMOTHERAPY.
Her Oncologist, Dr. Arzoo, Burbank, California, immediately tried to use laws and police power to force her to accept the treatment that HE thought was right for her. The path he followed, to make it "look" proper, was to have her immediately report to a "mental health specialist" at the hospital she was using -- with that "mental health specialist" (a psychiatrist) having the POWER to DECLARE her to be "mentally incompetent," and therefore not capable of making "proper" health care decisions on her own.
Here is public information about him:
Dr. Karo K. Arzoo, MD
- 2601 West Alameda Avenue Suite 210
- Burbank,
- California
- 91505
-
| Medical School |
University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine
Completed: 1996
|
Top 25% |
|
Ranked #38 out of 144 in primary care by US News & World Report.
Ranked #11 out of 144 in research quality by US News & World Report. |
I will not reveal how we avoided that demand from Dr. Arzoo, but I can tell you that he looked my wife in the eye and told her she had less than a few years to live and had to continue his treatment. I complained about the denial of "standard treatment" which "standard, however, was not allowed within the HMO insurance rules we were under. Ultimately, my complaint was successful and the HMO DID pay for the ELEVEN hour surgery which resulted in the final cure -- a surgery which was "standard" under Medicare, but not under the HMO.
In this case the Medicare was much better, for us, than the HMO, but WHAT help is available for a senior with terminal cancer? In fact, the Oncologist in charge of my wife's case wanted to have her declared mentally incompetent, so he could force a medical treatment that was "mecically sub-standard" as well as, in fact, causing her death.
The British system is most restrictive, using a black-box actuarial formula known as "quality-adjusted life years," or QALYs, that determines who can receive what care. If a treatment isn't deemed to be cost-effective for specific populations, particularly the elderly, the National Health Service simply doesn't pay for it. Even France—which has a mix of public and private medicine—has fixed reimbursement rates since the 1970s and strictly controls the use of specialists and the introduction of new medical technologies such as CT scans and MRIs.
Yes, the U.S. "rations" by ability to pay (though in the end no one is denied actual care). This is true of every good or service in a free economy and a world of finite resources but infinite wants. Yet no one would say we "ration" houses or gasoline because those goods are allocated by prices. The problem is that governments ration through brute force—either explicitly restricting the use of medicine or lowering payments below market rates. Both methods lead to waiting lines, lower quality, or less innovation—and usually all three.
A lot of talk has centered on what Sarah Palin inelegantly called "death panels." Of course rationing to save the federal fisc will be subtler than a bureaucratic decision to "pull the plug on grandma," as Mr. Obama put it. But Mrs. Palin has also exposed a basic truth. A substantial portion of Medicare spending is incurred in the last six months of life.
Top
From the point of view of politicians with a limited budget, is it worth spending a lot on, say, a patient with late-stage cancer where the odds of remission are long? Or should they spend to improve quality, not length, of life? Or pay for a hip or knee replacement for seniors, when palliative care might cost less? And who decides?
Karl Note: I am 78, have two artificial hips. I need an artificial knee to reduce the terrible pain there -- Medicare will pay for it NOW, how about when Obama Death Care takes over?
Medicare is broken anyway, of course, but at my age it will probably last long enough for ME. Our society, however, is in for coming dark times because our so-called "health care system" is based totally on "someone else (taxpayer) pays." Whenever something is "free" people will have a demand that exceeds supply, and only rationing of some kind will prevent eventual bankruptcy.
Even the so-called conservatives are afraid of suggesting we "go back" to what our founders had -- the "private health care -- no 'insurance'." At our founding, doctors were often willing to give free medical care and were more than willing to accept barter from patients, with some paying one rate and others who "had money" paying more -- all without government force.
Voluntary charity is healthy for any culture, but government-financed welfare destroys the moral fiber and, eventually, the work ethic and thus destroys the economy.
Obama has turned an already slave-mentality society (where someone else provids everything -- from food to doctors and housing).
That slavery, however, 250 years ago as now, will mean less than you want or need, but more than the slave-master/dictator wants to pay -- so, he wins and you lose.
In Britain, the NHS decides, and under its QALYs metric it generally won't pay more than $22,000 for treatments to extend a life six months. "Money for the NHS isn't limitless," as one NHS official recently put it in response to American criticism, "so we need to make sure the money we have goes on things which offer more than the care we'll have to forgo to pay for them." (Full Reference On Background Page HERE.)
My wife directly disagreed with Dr. Arzoo, and refused any further chemo therapy or radiation -- and now, some 5+ years later, she has had regular PET Scans and Cat Scans, every year, showing no sign of cancer. Medicare pays this (until the coming bankruptcy) but private insurance could not afford to.
She was "pronounced CURED" by two MDs on the Staff of UCLA Hospital and continues to thrive today -- despite Arzoo's attempt to FORCE her to continue cancer treatment which, she knew and I knew, was killing her.
I went though many letters, complaints and actions to help her to be cured, completely, and to free her from the attempts by these so-called experts to claw drag her back to the death-treatments they were giving her.
SHE TOOK PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for her life and for her own care. I supported her decisions every inch of the way.
OBAMA and his plan are making it harder than ever to take personal responsibility for yourself.
He is nothing more than a "plantation slave owner" getting even with the whites who enslaved his ancestors and creating his own slaves from the free men and women in our society, black, white, brown or other color.
Sadly, millions of them have given themselves willingly to this slavery -- when they wake up it will be too late -- they have already lost their freedom.
There IS a path out, and if you read my Book and these Newsletters, I'll help you find that path.
Click Here to read about Karl and Jean in their retirement, taking up this new mission to speak the truth about the much bigger problem facing us than what is broadly publicized.
To subscribe to The Dark Times Digest PREMIUM Edition, Please CLICK HERE, THEN fill in the form below completely and click "Subscribe" You will then be able to send personal messages to Karl Loren and expect to get a personal response as a Premium Subscriber. Don't worry if you are not sure whether or not you have already signed up -- if you enter your data and you are already signed up, you'll get a message confirming your existing subscription.
The full story including the above quotes, is in my Book, "The Coming Dark Times Turmoil," some 600+ pages with Part One, 433 pages, now published and available at no cost by clicking here.
This Book is published in PDF format. You can open, read, download, copy it with Acrobat Reader #7 or higher. It cannot be printed or altered, however.
The Book is digitally signed by me, Author, Karl Loren. My digital certificate in the document assures you that it has not been altered in any way since I placed that digital certificate into the document.
If you do not already have the free download of Acrobat, you can get it free by clicking here, or for more information click below on Background.
Click Here for more: BACKGROUND
Including news about Karl Loren's attendance at his 50th Reunion of his MBA Graduating Class of 1959 at the Harvard School of Business on May 28, 2009.
|
